Sony Computer Entertainment Europe

Breach details

What Loss of personal data (names, addresses, email addresses, dates of birth, poorly-protected account passwords). Customers’ payment card details also potentially at risk.
How much Redacted. Information Week stated 77 million records.
When Detected 19 April 2011
Why In what was perhaps one of the most infamous breaches in recent times, attackers deliberately breached the Sony Playstation Network Platform security and compromised the confidentiality of the information stored.

BW Comments

This is the most heavily redacted monetary penalty notice published by the Commissioner. The details of the breach in the MPN are superficial, although there is much general information available elsewhere on the Internet. Essentially the attackers exploited a system vulnerability and extracted data including personal data, poorly-hashed passwords and encrypted payment card data. The MPN makes it clear that the exploited vulnerabilities were publicly known, and that ‘appropriate updates were available’.

The lessons that all organisations can learn are simple:

  1. Patch systems regularly.
  2. Run regular external vulnerability scans against systems.

Regulatory action

Regulator ICO
Action Monetary penalty of £ 250,000
When 14 January 2013

Why the regulator acted

Breach of act Breach of the seventh principle: the data controller failed to ensure appropriate technical measures were taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data stored on the Newwork Platform, such as additional cryptographic controls to protect passwords and regular patching of vulnerabilities.
Known or should have known Various Sony online networks had previously been the subjects of attacks from hacktivist organisations.
Vast amounts of personal data including financial information were stored on the Network Platform, where system vulnerabilities had not been addressed. The data controller should have anticipated a further attack and, given Sony’s technical expertise, should have put the necessary technical measures in place.
Likely to cause damage or distress It should have been obvious to the data controller that the loss of the substantial volume of personal data held on the Network Platform was likely to cause substantial harm or substantial distress to the data subjects.

BW Observations


A lack of basic security practices such as poor vulnerability management and what can only be assumed to be weak password hashes (at a guess, unsalted MD5) are sufficient to justify a MPN, especially when you consider the number of accounts and the attractiveness to an attacker. The amount could be seen as excessive given that no sensitive personal data was compromised, however it has to be remembered that some 77 million records were compromised. It is the sheer volume of the data breach that influenced the Commissioner.

The ICO correctly observed that the poorly-hashed passwords may be able to be used by the attackers to compromise customer’s accounts at other sites where the customer used the same username and password. This appeared to influence his thoughts on the size of the monetary penalty. However it is interesting to consider whether the poor password management practices of consumers should affect how an organisation chooses to value, and therefore protect, stored passwords. Should passwords be valued as a credential for just the single site, or valued (and protected accordingly) because it is known that many customers’ passwords will also be able to be used to access unrelated sites?

It has been reported that Sony intends to appeal the MPN to the Information Tribunal.

Prospect

Breach details

What Loss of sensitive personal information (Union membership).
How much About 19,000 records.
When 08 Dec 2011
Why Two files containing member data were sent as part of a tendering process to an unknown email address in error. The files were encrypted but the password was also sent seperately to the same address.

BW Comments

This breach illustrates two issues that all Data Controllers need to be aware of. The first is that test data should always be anonymised, not only does it increase the risk of breaching the seventh principle, but it will also breach the first and second principles; although interestingly the ICO only took action in respect of the seventh principle. Secondly, any encryption is only as good as the key (password) management – passwords should always be sent at a minimum by a separate channel.

Regulatory action

Regulator ICO
Action Undertaking to comply with the seventh data protection principle
When 16 Jan 2013
Details The data controller to ensure that adequate policies are in place to cover transfer of data to third parties, that such data is minimised and anonymised, that all staff receive data protection training, and that appropriate security measures are in place to protect personal data.

BW Observations

Although this was a sizeable breach of some 19,000 records of sensitive personal data, the ICO obviously decided that an undertaking was more appropriate given the potential harm that could result.

Dacorum Borough Council

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

1,000 records.

Why

An unencrypted hard drive was stolen from an adventure playground following a burglary. It contained registration documents relating to about 1000 children who have attended the playground.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all staff are made aware of the data controller’s policy for the storage and use of personal data. Personal data must not be retained any longer than relevant and must be disposed of in a secure manner once no longer needed.

Reason for action

The Commissioner’s enquiries revealed that the registration documents were stored on the desktop and were not password protected. The previous password protection had been removed when a member of staff left the Council and was not restored. It was also revealed that no annual review of the database had been performed, resulting is registration documents not being deleted in line with the Council’s retention policy.

When

10 February 2012.

Links

View PDF of the Dacorum Borough Council Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Dacorum Borough Council Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Manpower UK Ltd

What

Inappropriate disclosure of personal data.

How much

400 records.

Why

A spreadsheet containing 400 people’s personal details was accidentally email to 60 employees.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all staff are made aware of policies regarding the transmission of personal data via email, included the need to password protect or encrypt the data according to the sensitivity of the data and the risk to the data subjects.

Reason for action

The employee had initially believed that the spreadsheet contained only the employee numbers of those 60 staff. However the data was transmitted unsecured over the internet and it could not be confirmed that all recipients had deleted the email as requested

When

20 January 2012.

Links

View PDF of the Manpower UK Ltd Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Manpower UK Ltd Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Bay House School

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

20,000 records.

Why

Malicious website intrusion.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that encryption is used, annual penetration tests are performed and password policies are updated to ensure security.

Reason for action

A member of staff was using the same password for the school’s website and management systems, allowing the attackers, including at least one pupil, with the system administration information required to attack the system.

When

08 August 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Bay House School Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Bay House School Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

HCA international Limited

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

Unknown.

Why

Theft of an unencrypted laptop from one of the group’s hospitals.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that sufficient standard encryption is used and physical security is upgraded.

Reason for action

  • Laptop containing the data was unencrypted.
  • Physical security of the laptop was deemed insufficient to prevent theft.

When

05 August 2011.

Links

View PDF of the HCA International Limited Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the HCA International Limited Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Forth Valley NHS Board

What

Loss of sensitive personal information.

How much

Unknown.

Why

An unencrypted and non-password protected memory stick containing sensitive personal data was handing in to a newspaper.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that any board issued portable media devices are sufficiently encrypted and that sufficient physical security measures are taken.

Reason for action

It was unclear how the memory stick ended up in the possession of the Newspaper, but it was unencrypted and not password protected.

When

30 September 2010

Links

View PDF of the Forth Valley NHS Board Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Forth Valley NHS Board Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust

What

Loss sensitive of personal information.

How much

112 records.

Why

An unencrypted CD containing scans of patients’ records was found at a nearby bus stop.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all staff are made aware of and trained in the data controller’s policies for the storage and management of data. Patient charts released to consultants are to be signed for on receipt and are to be chased for return within a week and weekly thereafter.

Reason for action

The CD was unencrypted and not password protected. The patient charts it contained were several years old. It was unclear how exactly the CD had came to be made. Any patient charts released to consultants would not be chased for return for a month.

When

19 August 2010

Links

View PDF of the Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Trust

What
Unnecessarily sharing of sensitive personal data

How much
917 records

Why
An excessive amount of data was emailed to another Trust partner via a non-secure email account

Regulator
ICO

Regulatory action
Undertaking issued to ensure that staff are given sufficient training and that only the minimum data for the intended purpose is extracted or transferred.

Reason for action
The spreadsheet containing the records was not passport protected and the department had no “business need” to have access to the clinical data.

When
15 June 2010

Links
View PDF of the Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Ysgol Bro Famau

What
Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much
A few records.

Why
A computer containing sensitive personal data relating to the data controller’s pupils was stolen from an administration.

Regulator
ICO

Regulatory action
Undertaking issued to ensure that all portable media devices used to store or transmit personal data are suitably encrypted. Physical security measures must be adequate to prevent unauthorised access to personal data. Staff must be made aware of and trained to follow the data controller’s policy for the storage, use, retention, or disposal of personal data.

Reason for action
The computer was stored on a desk in view of an insecure window. It was protected by a password but not encrypted. Investigations revealed that staff needed further training in data protection and that physical security was inadequate.

When
16 April 2010

Links
View PDF of the Ysgol Bro Famau Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)