Google

What

Mistaken collection of payload data.

How much

Unknown, but likely to be minimal.

Why

Google Streetview Vans, adapted to pick up on publically available Wi-Fi signals had mistakenly collected payload data.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that Google puts in place improved training measures on security awareness and data protection issues for all employees. Project engineers will be required to maintain a privacy design document for every new project before it is launched. All the payload data must be deleted.

Reason for action

Google took rapid remedial action, however the fact that issue occurred at all was still of note. Google was required to facilitate a consensual audit by the ICO.

When

19 November 2010

Links

View PDF of the Google Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Google Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Rainforest Alliance Ltd

What

Potential loss of personal data.

How much

Unknown.

Why

Theft of an unencrypted Laptop during a domestic burglary.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all portable media devices are sufficiently encrypted and that staff are sufficiently trained and monitored in the Data controllers security policies.

Reason for action

Although the laptop was password protected and used with permission it was not encrypted and it emerged that only some of the data it contained had been backed up on the office server. It was concluded that the data controller had not provided adequate guidance on physical security.

When

11 November 2010

Links

View PDF of the Rainforest Alliance Ltd Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Rainforest Alliance Ltd Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Portsmouth City Council

What

Inappropriate disclosure of personal information.

How much

One record.

Why

Third-party data related to an individual was inappropriately released due to a SAR request.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all individuals dealing with SARS receive sufficient training and guidance.

Reason for action

It transpired that the individual tasked with redacting data for this type of request was neither an employee of the data controller nor acting under process as a data processor. It was also revealed the guidance and checking of these processes was inadequate.

When

19 October 2010

Links

View PDF of the Portsmouth City Council Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Portsmouth City Council Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland

What

Inappropriate disclosure of personal information.

How much

One record.

Why

A document containing an individual’s name and address was inadvertently attached to an email and sent to over three hundred individuals.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all staff are made aware of and are appropriately trained in procedures for distributing emails and adequate checks are carried out.

Reason for action

Although staff had received advice and training on data protection issues in general there was no written guidance or instructions on how to deal with this type of work.

When

19 October 2010

Links

View PDF of the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust

What

Loss of sensitive personal information.

How much

Unknown.

Why

Loss of an unencrypted USB stick.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that the data controller’s policy for the use of portable media and storage and use of personal media is clarified and all staff are made aware of its provisions .

Reason for action

The unencrypted USB stick had not been issued by the data controller.

When

20 September 2010

Links

View PDF of the East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust

What

Loss sensitive of personal information.

How much

112 records.

Why

An unencrypted CD containing scans of patients’ records was found at a nearby bus stop.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all staff are made aware of and trained in the data controller’s policies for the storage and management of data. Patient charts released to consultants are to be signed for on receipt and are to be chased for return within a week and weekly thereafter.

Reason for action

The CD was unencrypted and not password protected. The patient charts it contained were several years old. It was unclear how exactly the CD had came to be made. Any patient charts released to consultants would not be chased for return for a month.

When

19 August 2010

Links

View PDF of the Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

The Children’s Mutual

What

Loss of sensitive personal information.

How much

One record.

Why

An annual account statement was accidently sent to an incorrect address.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all staff with access to personal data are made aware of policies regarding its storage and use and that regular reports shall be run in order to identify any address mismatches.

Reason for action

Enquiries revealed that the data controller had not implemented adequate reporting procedures to identify these sorts of discrepancies.

When

19 August 2010

Links

View PDF of the Children’s Mutual Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Children’s Mutual Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

West Sussex County Council

What
Loss of sensitive personal information.

How much
Unknown.

Why
Theft of an unencrypted laptop from an employee’s home

Regulator
ICO

Regulatory action
Undertaking issued to ensure that all portable media devices used to store personal data are sufficiently encrypted and that staff are made aware of policies on data protection.

Reason for action
Enquiries revealed that the employee had not received any formal data protection/IT security training and was unaware of how to access the data controller’s secure network drive remotely. Although encrypted removable media was available to staff no technical measures were yet in place to enforce their use and it was also discovered that about 2,300 unencrypted laptops were likely to still be in use.

When
17 June 2010

Links
View PDF of West Sussex County Council Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of West Sussex County Council Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

London Borough of Barnet

What
Loss of sensitive personal information.

How much
Over 9,000 records.

Why
Theft of an encrypted laptop and unencrypted USB and CDs from an employee’s home.

Regulator
ICO

Regulatory action
Undertaking issued to ensure that all portable media devices used to store or transmit personal data are sufficiently encrypted and that staff are suitably trained in the data controller’s policies on data protection, which must be regularly monitored.  Finally the data controller shall agree to a further audit by the ICO within the current fiscal year, to ensure that the requirements of this undertaking are met.

Reason for action
The employee had downloaded the data into the unencrypted devices without authorisation, though enquires revealed that insufficient measures were in place to prevent staff from doing so.

When
15 June 2010

Links
View PDF of London Borough of Barnet Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of London Borough of Barnet Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Trust

What
Unnecessarily sharing of sensitive personal data

How much
917 records

Why
An excessive amount of data was emailed to another Trust partner via a non-secure email account

Regulator
ICO

Regulatory action
Undertaking issued to ensure that staff are given sufficient training and that only the minimum data for the intended purpose is extracted or transferred.

Reason for action
The spreadsheet containing the records was not passport protected and the department had no “business need” to have access to the clinical data.

When
15 June 2010

Links
View PDF of the Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)