Brighton and Hove Council

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

Records relating to up to seven families.

Why

Theft of an unencrypted laptop during a burglary and on a separate occasion details of an employee’s income and salary deductions was accidently emailed to 2,821 employees.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that that all portable media devices are suitably encrypted and appropriate administrative measures are put into place to control employee use of email groups.

Reason for action

The laptop was stolen from the home of a sessional worker, a casual employee under contract for a specific assignment. The data sent to the worker was supposed to have been anonymised, but had not been.

When

10 February 2012.

Links

View PDF of the Brighton and Hove Council Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Brighton and Hove Council Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Manpower UK Ltd

What

Inappropriate disclosure of personal data.

How much

400 records.

Why

A spreadsheet containing 400 people’s personal details was accidentally email to 60 employees.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all staff are made aware of policies regarding the transmission of personal data via email, included the need to password protect or encrypt the data according to the sensitivity of the data and the risk to the data subjects.

Reason for action

The employee had initially believed that the spreadsheet contained only the employee numbers of those 60 staff. However the data was transmitted unsecured over the internet and it could not be confirmed that all recipients had deleted the email as requested

When

20 January 2012.

Links

View PDF of the Manpower UK Ltd Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Manpower UK Ltd Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Richard Dominic Preston

What

Loss of personal data.

How much

Unknown.

Why

Theft of an unencrypted laptop from the data controller’s home.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all portable media devices used to store personal data are encrypted to a sufficient standard.

Reason for action

Although much of the data on the laptop would have been in the public domain, it included email correspondence relating to legal cases.

When

06 December 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Richard Dominic Preston Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Richard Dominic Preston Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Godalming College

What

Inappropriate disclosure of sensitive personal data.

How much

Unknown.

Why

An email with an attachment containing sensitive personal data was inadvertently sent to lower-sixth form students rather than their tutors. The email was only intended to contain a link to the attachment.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that any documents containing personal data relating to students will only be provided to staff on a “need to know” basis and will not, in any event, be transmitted via email unless encrypted.

Reason for action

Although efforts were made to delete or recall the email, some students had already saved or forwarded the attachment and some media publicity resulted.

When

06 December 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Godalming College Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Godalming College Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Worcestershire County Council

Breach details

What Inappropriate disclosure of sensitive personal information.
How much “A large number” of records.
When Unknown
Why A member of staff accidently clicked on an additional contact list while sending out an email intended for internal use and so two spreadsheets containing sensitive personal information were sent to 23 registered care providers.

Regulatory action

Regulator ICO
Action Monetary penalty of £ 80,000
When 28 November 2011

Why the regulator acted

Breach of act Staff were not provided with sufficient training and internal and external email distribution lists were not clearly differentiated.
Inappropriate organisational and technical measures.
Known or should have known Employees routinely dealt with confidential and sensitive personal data and manages should have realised the potential for human error when selecting emails lists.
Likely to cause damage or distress Details of vulnerable young adults.

North Somerset Council

Breach details

What Inappropriate disclosure of sensitive personal information.
How much Two records.
When 12 November 2010
Why A council employee accidently sent five emails (on separate occasions), two of which contained highly sensitive information relating to a child’s serious case review, to the wrong NHS employee.

Regulatory action

Regulator ICO
Action Monetary penalty of £ 60,000
When 28 November 2011

Why the regulator acted

Breach of act Staff not given sufficient information governance training and management should have signed off on emails, ensuring that all sensitive data was encrypted.
Inappropriate organisational and technical measures.
Known or should have known Data controller was used to handling confidential and sensitive data and should have been aware of the “self evident” risks of drop down email menus. Repeated breaches demonstrate this fact.
Likely to cause damage or distress Data related to vulnerable individuals and could be misused.

Spectrum Housing Group

What

Personal data relating to employees accidently sent to an outside recipient.

How much

200 records.

Why

Records accidently sent to an outside recipient due to the data controllers’ e-mail system automatically predicting the intended recipient based on previous sent messages.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that personal data will only be sent by email when necessary. Data should be made secure and staff should be made aware of company policies.

Reason for action

Insufficient measures were taken to prevent an accidental loss of unsecured personal information.

When

19 October 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Spectrum Housing Group Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Spectrum Housing Group Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

Unknown.

Why

Theft of unencrypted laptop from a staff member’s home.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that staff members are made aware sensitive personal data is not to be forwarded to personal email accounts under any circumstances.

Reason for action

Data was emailed by a staff member to a personal account and downloaded onto a personal, unencrypted, laptop.

When

07 September 2011.

Links

View PDF of the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

The Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

10 records.

Why

An email containing sensitive information was sent to an unknown 3rd party and nine case files were temporarily lost during a move.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that staff are made aware that they may not send data to personal email accounts.

Reason for action

Information was emailed despite a policy being in place that stated this could only be done if sent to an equally secure recipient. A filing cabinet was not checked for case files during a move.

When

02 September 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

London Borough of Greenwich

What

Two incidents of disclosure of sensitive personal information.

How much

Two records.

Why

Information sent to incorrect email addresses.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that the Council’s IT policy specifically makes it clear that data is not to be sent to personal emails.

Reason for action

Both incidents saw staff fail to adhere to the Council’s IT policy, regarding the encryption of data. However the policy did not explicitly prevent the sending to data to personal emails.

When

10 August 2011.

Links

View PDF of the London Borough of Greenwich Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the London Borough of Greenwich Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)