Central Essex Community Services

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

249 records.

Why

Loss of a birth book from a locked storage room.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that sufficient physical security measures are in place for the storage of paper medical records and compliance with these measures are monitored.

Reason for action

The birth book was supposed to be locked in a filing cabinet in accordance with the data controller’s policy, but it was stored on top of the cabinet due to a lack of storage space.

When

21 November 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Central Essex Community Services Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Central Essex Community Services Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Oliver Letwin, MP

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

“Numerous”

Why

The data controller was disposing of documents in public waste bins in St James’ Park.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that any documents containing personal data must be disposed in a secure manner, such as shredding, pulping or incineration.

Reason for action

Some of the documents disposed of in the public waste bins included personal information such as names and addresses.

When

15 November 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Oliver Letwin MP Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Oliver Letwin MP Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

What

Loss of personal data.

How much

“Thousands”

Why

Loss of an unencrypted USB stick.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issues to ensure that all portable media devices used to store personal data are sufficiently encrypted and that policies and procedures on the storage, processing, transmission and disposal of personal data shall be reviewed and revised by no later than 1 December 2011.

Reason for action

Although much of the data on the USB stick was already available in the public domain it became clear during investigations that data protection training was insufficient and that encrypted memory sticks were not provided in those cases when more private data would have been stored.

When

03 November 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Newcastle Youth Offending Team

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

100 records.

Why

Theft of an unencrypted laptop from a home address of an employee of a hired data processor.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that all data processors contracted on the data controllers behalf comply with the principles of the Act and in particular that all potable media devices are sufficiently encrypted.

Reason for action

The data controller did not have an appropriate contract in place with the data processor which stipulated the need to encrypt devices containing personal data.

When

28 October 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Newcastle Youth Offending Team Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Newcastle Youth Offending Team Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust

What

Loss of sensitive personal data on two occasions.

How much

One record and 18 records.

Why

A patient’s medical record was allegedly found in a waste bin outside Coventry’s University Hospital by a member of the public. Two months previously the records of 18 patients were found in a public waste bin in a residential apartment block.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that policies relating to the storage, use, disposure and removal from the premises of personal information are made clear to staff and that compliance is monitored.

Reason for action

The short time between the two incidents suggested that insufficient measures were being taken to safeguard personal data.

When

27 October 2011.

Links

View PDF of the University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Dumfries and Galloway Council

What

Accidental online disclosure of staff’s personal information.

How much

887 records.

Why

Records were accidently published online in response to a Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act request.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to undergo an externally commissioned audit and to put it place checks to prevent another such occurrence.

Reason for action

Insufficient measures were taken to prevent an accidental loss of unsecured personal information.

When

17 October 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Dumfries and Galloway Council Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Dumfries and Galloway Council Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust

What

Accidental destruction of achieved records containing sensitive personal data.

How much

10,000 records.

Why

Records accidently placed in a disposal room.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that data is physically secure against destruction.

Reason for action

Due to a lack of space in achieves, records were placed in a disposal room and accidently disposed of.

When

04 October 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Undertaking)

View PDF of the Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Poole Hospital NHS Trust

What

Loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

240 records.

Why

Theft of two diaries stolen from a nurses’ car.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that data is kept physically secure both at home and in the work place and that personal data is kept to the minimum required and anonymised where possible.

Reason for action

The diaries contained information the nurse might need off hours, but were kept, unsecured, in her car outside her home.

When

04 October 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Poole Hospital NHS Trust Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Poole Hospital NHS Trust Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Eastleigh Borough Council

What

Potential loss of sensitive personal data.

How much

“Several”

Why

A member of the press claimed to have received a list containing sensitive personal information – the extent of this information and how he obtained it are “unclear”.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that personal information kept on the list is minimised and it is kept more secure.

Reason for action

The list contained excessive personal information for its purposes.

When

20 September 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Eastleigh Borough Council Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Eastleigh Borough Council Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)

Child Exploitation Online Protection Centre and the Serious Organised Crime Agency

What

The CEOP’s website reporting forms were being transmitted insecurely.

How much

None.

Why

A member of the public realised that the website’s reporting page was insecure.

Regulator

ICO

Regulatory action

Undertaking issued to ensure that the website is made secure and subject to regular checks.

Reason for action

Reports were transmitted unencrypted in plain text and this had been the case for several months.

When

15 September 2011.

Links

View PDF of the Child Exploitation Online Protection Centre and the Serious Organised Crime Agency Undertaking (Via ICO Website)

View PDF of the Child Exploitation Online Protection Centre and the Serious Organised Crime Agency Undertaking (Breach Watch Archive)